<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wanted! Best Disk Defragmenter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/</link>
	<description>Malaysia Tech Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 20:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michaelb123</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-200640</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelb123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-200640</guid>
		<description>OK. the best i found was SYMANTEC/NORTON. also it places files in such manner to speed up and keeps the swap at the other end. also boot files at beginning. very worth it. but it does sound like you have some hardware issue. before you defrag, you must scan and mark off bad sectors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. the best i found was SYMANTEC/NORTON. also it places files in such manner to speed up and keeps the swap at the other end. also boot files at beginning. very worth it. but it does sound like you have some hardware issue. before you defrag, you must scan and mark off bad sectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CypherHackz</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-105167</link>
		<dc:creator>CypherHackz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-105167</guid>
		<description>Dah. Dan tak best. Macam biasa je. He3. :D nape?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dah. Dan tak best. Macam biasa je. He3. <img src='http://www.cypherhackz.net/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#68;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#68;' /> nape?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ishak</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-104170</link>
		<dc:creator>Ishak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-104170</guid>
		<description>Dah cuba yg kat iobit.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dah cuba yg kat iobit.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny B. Goode</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-61525</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny B. Goode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-61525</guid>
		<description>PerfectDisk is my number 1 choice.
It's trusted and best.:d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PerfectDisk is my number 1 choice.<br />
It&#8217;s trusted and best.<img src='http://www.cypherhackz.net/smilies/yahoo_bigsmile.gif' alt='&#58;&#100;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#100;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CypherHackz</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-57219</link>
		<dc:creator>CypherHackz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-57219</guid>
		<description>maybe you can explain more details why we should not use diskeeper. im also like to know more about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe you can explain more details why we should not use diskeeper. im also like to know more about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xarzu</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-56976</link>
		<dc:creator>xarzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-56976</guid>
		<description>Diskeeper is a Scientology Thingy, in case you did not know.  Even if Executive Software which makes Diskeeper performs miracles on your hard drive, I would suggest you dump them.

How so I start my own discussion thread here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diskeeper is a Scientology Thingy, in case you did not know.  Even if Executive Software which makes Diskeeper performs miracles on your hard drive, I would suggest you dump them.</p>
<p>How so I start my own discussion thread here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CypherHackz</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-43502</link>
		<dc:creator>CypherHackz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 14:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-43502</guid>
		<description>[Comment ID #36045 Will Be Quoted Here]

i stick to ultimatedefrag. have you tried it yet?

[Comment ID #43442 Will Be Quoted Here]

i did that but it still happen to me. but no more worry, i'm using ultimate degfrag for now. thanks for the suggestion buddy. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class='comment_quote'><p><a href="http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-36045" title="Click here to view the original comment"><em>tunisian on April 3, 2007 at 8:35 pm said:</em></a></p>
<p>Diskeeper Pro 2007 unbeatable real time defrag.</p></blockquote>
<p>i stick to ultimatedefrag. have you tried it yet?</p>
<blockquote class='comment_quote'><p><a href="http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-43442" title="Click here to view the original comment"><em>JCS on May 1, 2007 at 10:53 am said:</em></a></p>
<p>try changing your filing system to NTFS it sounds like you have FAT32 and that takes at least a day to defrag if it is in good condition (for a 20gb harddrive) I found that when I changed my filing system it took an hour instead of two days lol quite a difference</p></blockquote>
<p>i did that but it still happen to me. but no more worry, i&#8217;m using ultimate degfrag for now. thanks for the suggestion buddy. <img src='http://www.cypherhackz.net/smilies/yahoo_smiley.gif' alt='&#58;&#41;' class='wp-smiley' width='18' height='18' title='&#58;&#41;' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCS</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-43442</link>
		<dc:creator>JCS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-43442</guid>
		<description>try changing your filing system to NTFS it sounds like you have FAT32 and that takes at least a day to defrag if it is in good condition (for a 20gb harddrive) I found that when I changed my filing system it took an hour instead of two days lol quite a difference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try changing your filing system to NTFS it sounds like you have FAT32 and that takes at least a day to defrag if it is in good condition (for a 20gb harddrive) I found that when I changed my filing system it took an hour instead of two days lol quite a difference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tunisian</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-36045</link>
		<dc:creator>tunisian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-36045</guid>
		<description>Diskeeper Pro 2007 unbeatable real time defrag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diskeeper Pro 2007 unbeatable real time defrag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stijn v.</title>
		<link>http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-17815</link>
		<dc:creator>stijn v.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cypherhackz.net/archives/2006/12/28/wanted-best-disk-defragmenter/#comment-17815</guid>
		<description>I use O&#38;O Defrag. They've got professional defrag software, but I managed to get a working keygen. When zipped the file is 7.26MB. You have my e-mail so contact me if you're still interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use O&amp;O Defrag. They&#8217;ve got professional defrag software, but I managed to get a working keygen. When zipped the file is 7.26MB. You have my e-mail so contact me if you&#8217;re still interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
